History not made
Labels: elections, scandals, Ted Stevens
One should never put on one's best trousers to go out to battle for freedom and truth. (Ibsen)
Labels: elections, scandals, Ted Stevens
Labels: elections, schadenfreude
LOLbama courtesy of Jezebel.Labels: Barack Obama, elections
Sanchez: You said [Obama] hangs around with people who are anti-Semitic. You--OK, we've got Khalidi on the table, give me number two. Who's the other anti-Semitic person that he hangs around with that we, quote, "all know about."
Goldfarb: Rick, we all know who number two is.
[Pause.]
Sanchez: WHO? [Pause] Would you tell us?
Goldfarb: No, Rick, I--I think we all know who we're talking about here.
Sanchez: Somebody who's anti-Semitic who he hangs around with?
Goldfarb: Absolutely.
Sanchez: Well SAY IT!
Goldfarb: I think we all know who we're talking about, Rick.
Labels: Barack Obama, elections, Mccain
GOP fundraising committee pulls plug on Bachmann (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
The national fundraising committee for GOP congressional candidates has canceled its Twin Cities TV advertising for Rep. Michele Bachmann, who is using the flap over her comments about Barack Obama to raise money on her own
Labels: elections
Labels: elections, Keith Olbermann, rants

If you happen to have any other documentation of Governor Palin's floral fashion statements, send them my way. It is certainly a distinctive calling card.Labels: Alaska, elections, fashion, feminism, Hillary Clinton, Mccain, palin
ABC News: A Look Back at Hillary's Year of PantsuitsYou know, technically, Obama always wears "pantsuits." Not that he doesn't have the legs to carry off a tasteful above-the-knee hem.
Glamour Magazine Salutes Hillary Clinton's Rainbow Coalition of Pantsuits
Labels: Barack Obama, elections, fashion, Hillary Clinton, pants

Labels: elections, Mount Pleasant
"I believe we are facing the transcendental challenge of the century of radical Islamic terrorism." (johnmccain.com)I am pretty sure McCain is not proposing yogic flying or a devotion to the work of Ralph Waldo Emerson as key elements of the radical Islamic terrorist challenge. He, or someone on his staff, is dealing a few tarot cards short of a full deck, because what McCain really means is something more like "surpassing" or "overarching." Or maybe "existential?"
Labels: elections, grammar and usage, Mccain, transcendentalism
Labels: Barack Obama, elections, Hillary Clinton
Senator John McCain of Arizona is set to meet with at least three potential running mates at a gathering at his ranch this weekend in Arizona...
...Mr. McCain is heading home on Friday for three days without a public schedule. His campaign described this as a social weekend that would include 10 couples, and -- as has been its policy -- declined to discuss any aspect of the vice-presidential search. (NYT)
Labels: elections
Labels: elections, foodie life
Labels: Barack Obama, elections
Nader Announces New Bid for White House
By HOPE YEN
WASHINGTON (AP) - Ralph Nader said Sunday he will run for president as a third-party candidate, criticizing the top White House contenders as too close to big business and pledging to repeat a bid that will "shift the power from the few to the many."
Ouch!Why not choose the man we endorsed for re-election in 1997 after a first term in which he showed that a dirty, dangerous, supposedly ungovernable city could become clean, safe and orderly? What about the man who stood fast on Sept. 11, when others, including President Bush, went AWOL?
That man is not running for president.
The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.
Mr. Giuliani's arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn't share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges.
The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city's and the country's nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.
Labels: elections, New York Times
"I was a little reluctant to ask him, because I didn't want him to do something that may cause any harm to his political future," McCain told reporters in Concord. "I felt it would be impactful in the election otherwise I wouldn't ask for it." (NBC First Read)Ugh, impactful? That is even worse than the use of "impact" as a verb. Please do not use this word, English speakers.
Labels: elections, grammar and usage
Labels: abortion, elections, gay rights, Republicans
[A spokesman] clarified that Mr. Paul did not support blowing up government buildings. "He wants to demolish things like the Department of Education," Mr. Benton said, "but we can do that very peacefully, in a constructive manner."
(NYT)
Labels: Democrats, elections, Republicans
Labels: elections
Labels: elections
Labels: elections, Republicans
Labels: Axis of Evil, Barack Obama, Democrats, elections, Hillary Clinton, Iraq
Labels: elections, House of Representatives, Republicans
Labels: Bush, elections, organizing
Labels: elections, feminism, Hillary Clinton, Klobuchar, McCaskill, Senators
That's what I thought of as I read about what some Missourians might consider their true worst nightmare:Labels: elections, McCaskill, Stephen Kin, Talent
Labels: elections
Labels: Christian Coalition, elections, Gibbons, scandals, Vegas
Labels: Condoleeza Rice, Democrats, elections, Republicans, scandals
Would it really be a problem for the Democrats if they were directionless going into the midterm elections this November?
In The New Republic this week, Peter Beinart postulates that the best strategy for the Dems is to keep any visionary agenda they may or may not have on the DL.
It makes sense. According to recent polling, an awful lot of Americans are pretty pissed at the Bush administration and/or the Republican led Congress right now. If you’re a Democrat, do you really want to complicate that equation? By pushing a bold national platform for voters to consider? (And bear in mind, it’s one thing to have a bold national platform, it’s another thing to push it aggressively.)
As Beinart writes, it seems quite possible that this is, in fact, the agreed-upon D strategy...and that the vagueness of their agenda is intentional.
Wishful thinking?
Labels: Democrats, elections, The New Republic