Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
History not made
Labels: elections, scandals, Ted Stevens
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Reaping the whirlwind
-
Virginia and Florida Go Obama Landslide Continues...
Title says it all...this is brutal...beyond brutal. Starting to know what it felt like to be Carter in 1980.
Labels: elections, schadenfreude
Monday, November 03, 2008
Final pre-election post
LOLbama courtesy of Jezebel.Labels: Barack Obama, elections
Saturday, November 01, 2008
Credit where credit is due, or, The Audacity of Bullshit
Seriously, how does one show up for a live interview on national TV so unprepared? But lost in our guffawing is the gutsiness of Goldfarb's bullshitting maneuver here. Not enough to make up for being a clueless twit, but executed with total, balls-out gumption.
Sanchez: You said [Obama] hangs around with people who are anti-Semitic. You--OK, we've got Khalidi on the table, give me number two. Who's the other anti-Semitic person that he hangs around with that we, quote, "all know about."
Goldfarb: Rick, we all know who number two is.
[Pause.]
Sanchez: WHO? [Pause] Would you tell us?
Goldfarb: No, Rick, I--I think we all know who we're talking about here.
Sanchez: Somebody who's anti-Semitic who he hangs around with?
Goldfarb: Absolutely.
Sanchez: Well SAY IT!
Goldfarb: I think we all know who we're talking about, Rick.
Labels: Barack Obama, elections, Mccain
Thursday, October 23, 2008
NRCC pulls funding for Bachmann campaign
But crazy doesn't pay the bills.
GOP fundraising committee pulls plug on Bachmann (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
The national fundraising committee for GOP congressional candidates has canceled its Twin Cities TV advertising for Rep. Michele Bachmann, who is using the flap over her comments about Barack Obama to raise money on her own
Labels: elections
Monday, October 20, 2008
Keith Olbermann wants to be Edward R. Murrow when he grows up
Tonight's "comment" is pure gold. He actually concludes it with "good night, and good luck." I heart you, Keith! Rant on!
Labels: elections, Keith Olbermann, rants
Friday, September 26, 2008
Friday, August 29, 2008
McCain to Democrats:

John McCain just announced Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his VP pick, to the surprise of many. (WP) He is sure gunning for Hillary Clinton supporters and I imagine this choice fits into that plan.
Palin is young (44), anti-corruption, firmly anti-abortion, has posed for Vogue, and differs with her new running mate on the subject of drilling in the Arctic Refuge.
She also really likes to wear giant flowers on her lapel, a la Carrie Bradshaw in 1999. I thought the pic above, from her gubernatorial inauguration, was an anomaly, until I ran across this one too.
If you happen to have any other documentation of Governor Palin's floral fashion statements, send them my way. It is certainly a distinctive calling card.Labels: Alaska, elections, fashion, feminism, Hillary Clinton, Mccain, palin
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Guess what: I'm wearing pants right now!
ABC News: A Look Back at Hillary's Year of PantsuitsYou know, technically, Obama always wears "pantsuits." Not that he doesn't have the legs to carry off a tasteful above-the-knee hem.
Glamour Magazine Salutes Hillary Clinton's Rainbow Coalition of Pantsuits
And no one ever writes about those.
Labels: Barack Obama, elections, fashion, Hillary Clinton, pants
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Our bartender is running for Congress

Labels: elections, Mount Pleasant
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
"I believe we are facing the transcendental challenge of the century of radical Islamic terrorism." (johnmccain.com)I am pretty sure McCain is not proposing yogic flying or a devotion to the work of Ralph Waldo Emerson as key elements of the radical Islamic terrorist challenge. He, or someone on his staff, is dealing a few tarot cards short of a full deck, because what McCain really means is something more like "surpassing" or "overarching." Or maybe "existential?"
Labels: elections, grammar and usage, Mccain, transcendentalism
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
The Clinton/RFK flap: just one more reason I want this election to be over
The assassination was not mentioned as "a reason to stay in the race," as Eugene Robinson misleadingly writes in his column this morning, or a suggestion that either Democratic contender might be assassinated for heaven's sake. This was Clinton picking her brain for a good example of a long nomination fight and failing to screen the results. Even Obama says so.
I hope Senator Clinton has learned her lesson about choosing historical examples a little more carefully, and props to Bobby Kennedy, Jr. for his classy response to the hubbub.
Labels: Barack Obama, elections, Hillary Clinton
Thursday, May 22, 2008
McCain veep selection process sounds like an episode of The Bachelor
Senator John McCain of Arizona is set to meet with at least three potential running mates at a gathering at his ranch this weekend in Arizona...
...Mr. McCain is heading home on Friday for three days without a public schedule. His campaign described this as a social weekend that would include 10 couples, and -- as has been its policy -- declined to discuss any aspect of the vice-presidential search. (NYT)
Labels: elections
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Market segmentation creeps me out
Those crunchy chocolate chip cookie people...weird, no surprise they are voting for McCain. I have nothing in common with those people. Chewy all the way.
Labels: elections, foodie life
Monday, April 14, 2008
My 2 cents on Bittergate
Do you ever wonder why sociology professors rarely get elected president? You have your answer, Mr. Obama!
Labels: Barack Obama, elections
Monday, February 25, 2008
Nader returns
Nader Announces New Bid for White House
By HOPE YEN
WASHINGTON (AP) - Ralph Nader said Sunday he will run for president as a third-party candidate, criticizing the top White House contenders as too close to big business and pledging to repeat a bid that will "shift the power from the few to the many."
Friday, January 25, 2008
Grey Lady harshes on Giuliani
They also took the opportunity to discuss, at length, why they passed over hizzoner Rudy Giuliani.
Ouch!Why not choose the man we endorsed for re-election in 1997 after a first term in which he showed that a dirty, dangerous, supposedly ungovernable city could become clean, safe and orderly? What about the man who stood fast on Sept. 11, when others, including President Bush, went AWOL?
That man is not running for president.
The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.
Mr. Giuliani's arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn't share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges.
The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city's and the country's nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.
Labels: elections, New York Times
Monday, December 17, 2007
Lieberman endorses McCain; McCain uses awful new word
"I was a little reluctant to ask him, because I didn't want him to do something that may cause any harm to his political future," McCain told reporters in Concord. "I felt it would be impactful in the election otherwise I wouldn't ask for it." (NBC First Read)Ugh, impactful? That is even worse than the use of "impact" as a verb. Please do not use this word, English speakers.
Labels: elections, grammar and usage
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Welcome to the Twilight Zone, I mean, Iowa
He has a shot. Conservatives like Bob Novak are already pointing to Huckabee's relatively liberal record on fiscal policy, and the new Romney ad campaign highlights some of Huckabee's positions on immigration as governor.
But what I think is really interesting about this ad is how it hides the threats to Romney's social-conservative credentials in plain sight. The ad points to conservative positions on abortion and gay marriage as two points of similarity between Romney and Huckabee, sweeping under the rug Romney's flip-flopping on choice and previous opposition to constitutional gay marriage bans for Massachusetts and for the U.S.
Labels: abortion, elections, gay rights, Republicans
Wednesday, November 07, 2007
Your presidential match
My #1 match on the issues was Dennis Kucinich--our first vegan president!
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
Lesson for Ron Paul
Presidential candidate Ron Paul has raised ungodly amounts of money through his website "ThisNovember5th.com." That's a heroic reference to Guy Fawkes' failed plot to blow up the British Parliament on November 5th, 1605, memorialized through a British holiday and referenced in V for Vendetta. Fortunately,
[A spokesman] clarified that Mr. Paul did not support blowing up government buildings. "He wants to demolish things like the Department of Education," Mr. Benton said, "but we can do that very peacefully, in a constructive manner."
(NYT)
Monday, September 10, 2007
No hablan
The Republican presidential candidates, interestingly, all declined Univision's offer of a GOP candidate debate. You've gotta have a pretty good reason to blow off the nation's largest Latino TV audience when you're running for president of the United States. (A reason that begins with "I" and rhymes with "schmimmigration"?) Doesn't bode well for the R candidates long-term if they all made this choice.
Labels: Democrats, elections, Republicans
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Whoa. Read this now!
Labels: elections
Friday, August 17, 2007
More 2008 ruminations
Labels: elections
Monday, August 13, 2007
Romney vs. the YouTube snowman
Well, there are a lot of things that the presidency ought to be held at a higher level than.* But aren't we being a bit intolerant here, Mr. Romney? (WP)
*I tried to avoid ending that sentence with a preposition but it was totally beyond me how to do it.
Damn, did it again!
Labels: elections, Republicans
Friday, June 29, 2007
The fascinating and the just plain weird
But he does not fascinate me nearly as much as Mike Gravel.
Labels: elections, House of Representatives, Republicans
Thursday, December 07, 2006
The Man is dead. Long live The Man.
I think that all progressive organizer-type-people should be sent to some kind of detox-counseling-yogic ashram to release some of the tension, resentment and fear of the last six years. Not that our problems are over, but...it's kinda hard to do your thing when we have this national case of political PTSD.
Labels: Bush, elections, organizing
Monday, November 20, 2006
Texas has officially been messed with
Rules: Martin Frost, D-Dallas
Agriculture: Charlie Stenholm, D-Abilene
Homeland Security: Jim Turner, D-Crockett
(As reported by the Dallas Morning News.)
What a bummer for the good people of Texas, who can't possibly deserve Tom DeLay any more than the rest of us deserve W.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Taking bets on women in power
Next question. Which will now come first, a woman president or a woman Senate majority leader? My prediction is president will be first. But I put this out more as a challenge to current and aspiring female senators.
*CORRECTION: How could I forget Klobuchar? Sorry, Minnesota! That brings the Senate female total to 16 for the 110th Congress.
Labels: elections, feminism, Hillary Clinton, Klobuchar, McCaskill, Senators
Ding, dong...
Just one of many reasons for joy over the last few hours.
By the way, Blogger® users may have noticed yesterday that Blogger was super slow. I'd guess that's because at least 99% of its bandwidth was being used at Tryst Coffeehouse in Adams Morgan, where CNN had set up an "E-lection Nite Blog Party." And quite a party it was, according to Wonkette.
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
"The day horror went into overdrive!"
"Imagine your worst nightmare: machines take over the world!"
That's what I thought of as I read about what some Missourians might consider their true worst nightmare:trying to vote for Clare McCaskill for Senator on a computerized voting machine, but instead having their votes recorded for GOP incumbent Jim Talent. (TPMcafe)
Labels: elections, McCaskill, Stephen Kin, Talent
Monday, November 06, 2006
The slacker's guide to voting in DC
Fear not, Washingtonian. The DCBOEE has you covered.
- Go here to check your registration status online.
- Go here to find out where your polling place is.
- If you are going to be traveling on election day, you can still vote TODAY by in-person absentee ballot. Go here.
- Perhaps you have discarded the "Voter's Guide," listing candidates and their positions, that the DCBOEE helpfully delivered to your home. No problem; you can see it online here.
Labels: elections
Friday, October 27, 2006
Thursday, October 19, 2006
What happens in Vegas
*Christian Coalition 90% score
Labels: Christian Coalition, elections, Gibbons, scandals, Vegas
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
[insert post about GOP imploding here]
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Here is a place where I could write about how Condi Rice does not take the best notes during meetings (SF Chron). Or about how some congressional Democrats and Republicans seem to be engaged in a breathless struggle to out-scandal each other ("We'll see your bribery and raise you one pedophile!"). Or about the potential for hard-right Republicans to get ousted by the conservative Christian vote that they have so carefully cultivated (WP). But I think the time has come to just sit back and watch Fate spin this one out as she desires.
PS: When did substance abuse stop being reason enough to question a lawmaker's fitness to serve and start being just an excuse for other, worse stuff?
Labels: Condoleeza Rice, Democrats, elections, Republicans, scandals
Thursday, September 28, 2006
For the record: this blogger has never used the N-word
Friday, September 01, 2006
Playing out the rope
Would it really be a problem for the Democrats if they were directionless going into the midterm elections this November?
In The New Republic this week, Peter Beinart postulates that the best strategy for the Dems is to keep any visionary agenda they may or may not have on the DL.
It makes sense. According to recent polling, an awful lot of Americans are pretty pissed at the Bush administration and/or the Republican led Congress right now. If you’re a Democrat, do you really want to complicate that equation? By pushing a bold national platform for voters to consider? (And bear in mind, it’s one thing to have a bold national platform, it’s another thing to push it aggressively.)
As Beinart writes, it seems quite possible that this is, in fact, the agreed-upon D strategy...and that the vagueness of their agenda is intentional.
Wishful thinking?
Labels: Democrats, elections, The New Republic






